Download Free Sample

Introduction

Several factors might affect or attract under the instance the behavior. This is especially where requests are compiled from the other individual, wherever it is relatively connected to the donation or any of the political causes. In this context, this essay analyzes a case study of a Girl named Agnieszka. She is a 22-year-old female residing in a cool town and studying Law at Macquarie University. She is a hard-core fan of music and a pure vegetarian when it comes to food choices. While on a visit to a friend she met with a 70-year-old male, Piotrek who was collecting funds at the station Cooltown for a local station and was a classical music lover. He approached Agnieszka for signing the petition for the job he is playing on the station with a friendly and polite conversation.

Discussion

In the present case, Agnieszka should not have signed the petition based on just a few soft words or requests formed by the person to collect funds. As reviewed in the consistency theory, people are likely influenced by the donor who collects donations by making requests and evaluating the potentiality of the donor while donating and acknowledging the responses. Although Piotrek engages Agnieszka in a friendly and polite while beginning the conversation similar to the approach "Foot in the mouth" implies the frequency of the respective charitable form request for gathering social funds. Going through the present scenario, the donor needs to remain consistent with her state of feeling while following the manner to maintain the relationship formed by the person requesting. Identifying the facts of the given case, without knowing whether the donor is willing or showing interest in further communication on signing the government's petition, the requestor could not approach her further to participate in the donation. Similarly in the given case, without ascertaining Agnieszka's feelings about the petition for which she is being requested, she shall not sign a government petition, based on the verbal and friendly responses. Therefore, based on behavioral consistency, one could not simply influence the public for any signatory donation (Xu et al. 2020). This could lead to further legal complications or could be risky to sign without knowing the fund policy and procedures. The formation of the relational obligation is necessary to be developed with a more significant relational prospectus than any other approach related to FITM as studied in this type of case (Allen et al. 2022). Whenever a request is formed through casual dialogues, the individual approach is more behaved to comply with the same when the request is carried with a monologue. These results were appraised to be replicable and strong under a series of several studies. Moreover, the involvement of dialogues as a social influence technique filled by Piotrek could not be a valid reason for signing the petition (Grzyb et al. 2018). Social dialogue is like therapy to treat strangers who one could become eager to show his or her efforts on the request similar to the given case.

Determining the request with small favors approached by the different genders is the second reason for not signing the petition ascertained here. A prior thought that arrives while donating is whether the requestor appears to be genuine or belongs to the same sex and then the rate of behavior framed by the requestor is analyzed by the donor. As per the prediction, a significant number of people generally contribute to or are willing to pay funds to someone who looks the same in appearance (Klausner et al. 2022). Moreover, the matching tendency for appearances is stronger in the female. The difference of the sex is the common factor where one person generally does not get influenced easily by the other. Identified from the known facts of dress styles, behaviors, race, and age factors helps to analyze the assumption formed in the areas of similarity and there is a larger willingness to support a similar personality. Piotrek who is aged 70 years, and Agnieszka is just 22 years, belong to different cultures, origins, sex, habits, and patterns. One being a meat lover and another being vegetarian shows the difference in behaviors which also resembles the difference of choices further witnessing the reason with valid arguments for the present scenario. Adding to this, both the characters in the case are influenced by opposite music folk, as Agnieszka reported with love for hard-core music, she should not have commenced signing a petition for the music which lacks her interest. Therefore the difference of gender is another reason analyzed for not attempting the donation by Agnieszka which is cast by Piotrek for signing the petition.

The vital reason being acknowledged for not signing the petition can be that both belong to fans of the rival Soccer teams. Referring from the concepts of the Rivalry theory this argument is being determined with a valid answer where the theory aims to gain competitive advantages against each other within the common state (Leiblein et al. 2022). Further stated in the study, territorial settings and group affiliations affect compliance in request while engaged within a social cause. Intergroup competition and in-group loyalty are known behavioral version assessors of community species (Kruger et al.2020). The present case shows the reflection of informal groups where both the members in the given case are not influenced organizationally and are just formed or involved in response to the requirement for community contact. Generally, informal groups are not influenced or determined organizationally like in the present case where just belonging to the like surnames it is not possible to possess the same consent for any social cause, there could be several factors thoughts, approaches, thinking differences in the context of different matters (Munz et al. 2020). Humans generally have collision detection techniques that are delicate to signs of alliances. Choosing the rival teams is known to be the motivation defined under the physiological phenomenon. A study reported will highlight the differences or variations under the distinct dimensions identifications, Because of the presence of rivalry also as behavioral impacts on those lapsed donors (Reifurth et al. 2019). Fans of sports have the strength to identify rivals of their favorite sports teams and the significance of each of such rivals varies among persons based on the stage of importance. Therefore, a person might fail to believe or trust in the donation by the person believing rival team. Secondly, those rivals are perceived competitors of less significance and extract some emotions. Moreover, it is evaluated that intergroup competition is a significant component of behavior in humans.

Conclusion

The essay hereby concluded with the reason for not signing the petition for the donation that is being approached just based on verbal conversion and with many more reasons as mentioned in the essay. Donations are important as they carry a very important and crucial task which is being carried with generosity by the people. Funding with signatory proof in the petition would fall under legal obligation. Therefore, donation with a petition could lead to severe thoughts, and signing the donation with a petition only based on verbal and friendly conversation will not suffice. There are many reasons which are proved in the present case for not signing the respective petition.

Reference List

Allen, J., Rivkin, I. D., & Trimble, J. E. (2022). Relational methodology.Cultural methods in psychology: Describing and transforming cultures, 174-207.

Grzyb, T., Byrka, K., & Doliński, D. (2018). Dialogue as a tool enhancing the effectiveness of the activities of NGOs in modern societies 1. InDemocracy, Dialogue, Memory(pp. 83-94). Routledge.

Klausner, M., Ohlrogge, M., &Ruan, E. (2022). A sober look at SPACs.Yale J. on Reg.,39, 228.

Leiblein, M. J., Reuer, J. J., Larsen, M. M., & Pedersen, T. (2022). When are global decisions strategic? Global Strategy Journal, 12(4), 714-737.

Munz, K. P., Jung, M. H., & Alter, A. L. (2020). Name similarity encourages generosity: A field experiment in email personalization. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1071-1091.

Reifurth, K., Evans, K. M., James, J. D., & Ko, Y. J. (2019). The rivalry effect: The potential to foster (lapsed) donor giving. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 11(4), 5.

Xu, Q., Kwan, C. M., & Zhou, X. (2020). Helping yourself before helping others: How a sense of control promotes charitable behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology,30(3), 486-505.

You Might Also Like:-

Personality Psychology Concept Assignment Sample

Social Psychology Assignment Sample

Psychological Assessment And Report Writing