Introduction

A child's developing sense of self is greatly influenced by many key areas (Crawford, 2020). A few of them include the influence of religious beliefs on parenting practices, parenting styles, adverse childhood experiences, as well as the use of attachment theory. According to Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems theory, a person's development is highly impacted by a variety of environmental systems, from the larger societal and cultural contexts (macrosystem) to the individual's immediate family and home environment (microsystem) (O'Toole et al., 2019). An in-depth grasp of how environmental influences interact with a child's developing identity can be obtained by looking at these topics via the prism of Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory. A child's self-concept and emotional health are shaped by each of these domains in a unique way, which ultimately helps the child form their overall identity.

Parenting Styles

The way parents raise their children has a significant impact on how they develop as individuals. This idea has its roots in Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, which holds that various environmental systems have an impact on a child's development. Of these systems, a child's self-concept and self-esteem are greatly influenced by the microsystem, which consists of their immediate family and home environment (Halifah & Anshar, 2020). Four basic archetypes—authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and neglectful—are at the core of parenting approaches (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2023). Every style has a different impact on a child's sense of self, which in turn has an individual impact on their emotional and psychological health. An authoritarian parenting approach, marked by stringent regulations and elevated standards, can profoundly impact a child's sense of self (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2023). Children may grow up feeling obedient and compliant in this setting, but they may also feel inadequate or afraid of failing. They might begin to internalize the notion that their value is dependent on fulfilling outside expectations (Balantekin et al., 2020). As a result, they may develop a rigid self-concept and find it difficult to express themselves freely. On the other hand, a positive self-identity is promoted by authoritative parenting, which is characterized by a harmony between tenderness, firmness, and candid communication (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2023). Offspring in this setting typically acquire a strong sense of independence and competency. Feeling safe in knowing their parents will always be there for them, they learn to face obstacles, make choices, and speak out (Gao et al., 2021). By encouraging a positive self-image, this parenting approach helps kids see themselves as competent and deserving people.

The lack of structure and boundaries that define permissive parenting can have conflicting effects on a child's sense of self (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2023). These kids might have a strong sense of independence and freedom, but they might also have trouble with responsibility and impulse control. Because they might not have a solid foundation of boundaries and expectations, it can be difficult to develop a clear sense of who they are (Shahid & Akhter, 2023). Individuals might struggle with feelings of entitlement and self-doubt. Neglectful parenting, in which a parent does not participate much in their child's life, can harm their identity development (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2023). Children may feel severe feelings of abandonment and low self-worth in this setting. They might internalize the notion that they are unimportant or unworthy of notice. This may result in a brittle sense of self characterized by insecurity and worthlessness.

According to Bronfenbrenner's microsystem, a child's early emotional experiences are mostly focused on the family and are crucial to their development (Tudge et al., 2022). The child's emotional spectrum expands with age to consider the effects of a wider environment. This broader context, which considers cultural and outside factors, can be crucial in determining how emotions like shyness around strangers, feelings of embarrassment, and the emergence of romantic affection are shaped. The Ecological Systems Theory sheds additional light on how parenting practices affect a child's sense of self. These dynamics are rooted in the microsystem, which includes the immediate family and the home environment. The child's experiences and interactions within this microsystem are directly shaped by the parenting style (Tudge et al., 2022). For instance, a child's interactions with others may exhibit a hierarchical power dynamic and rigorous adherence to rules in an authoritarian household. This may affect the child's self-perception regarding authority figures, which could result in feelings of subordination or disobedience. According to Bronfenbrenner's theory, parenting styles have an even greater effect on self-identity when one considers the mesosystem, which is an outer system that involves interactions between various microsystems (Navarro & Tudge, 2022). For example, cognitive dissonance may arise if the child feels the parenting style is at odds with what they have experienced in other contexts, like school or social circles. The child's growing self-concept may be challenged by this incongruence, which could cause confusion or a shattered sense of identity (O'Toole et al., 2019). As a result, parenting practices have a significant impact on how a child develops their sense of self. Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory explains this, and an awareness of this complex interaction can help parents build a strong and healthy sense of self in their young children.

Attachment theory

John Bowlby's attachment theory investigates the significant influence of early relationships on a child's development (Wilson-Ali et al., 2019). It explores how a child's sense of self and capacity to build positive relationships in the future are influenced by the type of attachment they develop with their carers. A framework for comprehending how attachment dynamics function within diverse environmental systems is provided by Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, which clarifies the complex interactions between attachment and self-identity (Ward, 2020). Bronfenbrenner highlights how important it is for caring adults to have mutually beneficial interactions with children. (Hayes et al., 2022) He outlines five guiding principles that clarify how relationships nurtured at home and in school work together to support healthy growth. According to Bronfenbrenner, the biggest threat to a child's development—which affects the attachments he forms in his life—is the instability and unpredictability that characterize modern family dynamics (Paquette & Ryan, 2011).

The idea that newborns develop emotional ties, or attachments, with their primary carers is the foundation of attachment theory (Harlow, 2019). The child uses these attachments as a safe foundation to explore the outside world. Carers who are sensitive, responsive, and regularly available foster a secure attachment by giving the child a sense of security and trust. This stable foundation fosters a positive self-identity because the child internalizes they are important and deserving of love and care. On the other hand, an uneasy bond can negatively affect a child's growing sense of self (Harlow, 2019). When carers are not consistently responsive, the child develops an anxious-ambivalent attachment because they do not know if their needs will be met (Gagliardi, 2022). This lack of certainty may cause the child to become more anxious and unpredictable, damaging their belief in their value and the dependability of other people. Conversely, when carers consistently ignore or are unresponsive to the child's needs, an avoidant attachment forms. In this case, the child gains the ability to minimize their own needs and feelings as a means of adjusting to a setting in which asking for comfort or intimacy is met with apathy or rejection (Gagliardi, 2021). This may impede the emergence of close, trustworthy relationships in adulthood by fostering a self-identity characterized by independence and a dislike of depending on others. Disorganized attachment styles, which are typified by inconsistent caregiving and sometimes even frightening or abusive interactions, can significantly affect a child's sense of self (Harlow, 2019). In these situations, the child struggles to make sense of the actions of their carers and feels confused and disoriented. This may result in a shattered sense of self that is characterized by fear, feelings of unworthiness, and a lack of faith in other people (Gagliardi, 2021).

The Ecological Systems Theory developed by Bronfenbrenner offers a thorough lens through which to examine how attachment affects a child's sense of self (Feriver et al., 2020). Attachment dynamics are rooted in the microsystem, which includes the immediate family and the caregiving environment. Within this microsystem, the child's experiences and interactions are directly shaped by the level of attachment (Feriver et al., 2020). For instance, a child with a secure attachment will interact with others in a way characterized by trust, predictability, and safety. This gives the child a strong basis for building a positive self-concept based on the conviction that they are important and worthy of attention. The influence of attachment on self-identity is further enhanced by the mesosystem, which entails interactions between various microsystems. An unstable or inconsistent level of attachment, for example, can have a cascading effect on the child's experiences in other contexts, like school or social settings (Feriver et al., 2020). This may make it difficult to establish safe connections outside of the family, which could prolong a pattern of uneasy attachments. Consequently, the attachment theory clarifies the significant impact that early relationships have on a child's evolving sense of self. We can learn a great deal about how attachment dynamics function in different environmental systems by analyzing the quality of attachment within the context of Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory.

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) encompass a range of traumatic events that a child may encounter during their early years (Alhowaymel et al., 2021). These experiences can have profound and lasting effects on a child's development, including self-identity. Understanding how ACEs influence a child's self-perception is crucial in Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, which emphasizes the multifaceted interplay between environmental systems and a child's development (Chen et al., 2023). In the bioecological system, the richness of the microsystem's environment is crucial in a child's development. During the early stages, the relationships between mother-child, father-child, and father-mother pairs, which form the foundation of the microsystem, according to Bronfenbrenner, wield the greatest influence. These two-person dynamics are highly interactive; both parties grow and evolve together (O'Toole et al., 2019). Much of a child's behavior is shaped within this microsystem. Therefore, during this period, if a child experiences trauma, it can stay with him throughout his life, resulting in behavioral issues.

ACEs can manifest in various forms, including physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, neglect, household dysfunction, and witnessing domestic violence. These traumatic events disrupt a child's sense of safety, stability, and trust in their environment (Alhowaymel et al., 2021). As a result, they can profoundly impact a child's developing self-identity. In cases of physical or emotional abuse, a child's sense of self-worth and safety can be deeply compromised. They might start believing they are essentially flawed, undeserving, or unlovable. A fractured self-identity characterized by low self-esteem, feelings of shame, and a pervasive sense of inadequacy may result from this (Narayan et al., 2021). The young person can find it difficult to build positive relationships and might carry these unfavorable ideas of themselves into adulthood. When carers do not provide for a child's basic needs for love, care, and attention, it is called neglect, which is another type of ACE. A child may feel ignored, unimportant, and undeserving of care as a result of this. They might absorb the idea that their wants and emotions are unimportant, which can damage their self-esteem and prevent them from forging a positive self-identity. In their later years, they might still experience a persistent sense of emptiness and fear of abandonment.

Seeing domestic abuse in action is another ACE that can significantly affect a child's sense of who they are. Child may feel afraid, defenseless, and unable to defend themselves or their careers in this setting (Gilgoff et al., 2020). Individuals might internalize a feeling of helplessness and believe they have no control over their environment. As a result, their sense of agency and self-efficacy may be undermined, hindering their capacity to make decisions and deal with obstacles as adults (Alhowaymel et al., 2021). An environment of instability and unpredictability is created by household dysfunction, which can include substance abuse, mental illness, or the incarceration of a family member. Under such conditions, a child might become hypervigilant, always anticipating and adjusting to possible dangers or disturbances. This may cause the child to become hypervigilant, focusing more on survival than constructive self-development (Leza et al., 2021). Owing to this, they might always feel threatened and must be extremely aware of their surroundings, which could impact how they define themselves.

The Ecological Systems Theory developed by Bronfenbrenner offers a thorough framework for comprehending how ACEs impact a child's sense of self. The immediate family and home environment make up the microsystem, which is where the effects of ACEs are most noticeable (Narayan et al., 2021). The degree of care a child receives—or does not receive—directly affects their experiences and interactions in this microsystem. For instance, a child's interactions may exhibit inconsistent care and attention in a setting where neglect is prevalent. This may result in a child having a weakened sense of who they are and finding it difficult to internalize feelings of value and acceptance. The impact of ACEs on self-identity is further amplified by the mesosystem, which is the interaction between various microsystems. For example, a child's experiences in other settings, like school or social environments, may be impacted if they grow up in a home where trauma and instability are commonplace (Gilgoff et al., 2020). This may make it difficult to establish safe relationships outside of the family, which could prolong a trauma and insecurity cycle. To promote a positive self-identity and healthy development, we can thus learn a great deal about how traumatic events function within diverse environmental systems by analyzing the impact of ACEs within the context of Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory.

Religious beliefs and parenting practices

Parenting styles and religious convictions have a big impact on how a child develops their sense of self (Gralewski & Jankowska, 2020). The values, beliefs, and rituals instilled within the family's religious framework are the source of this influence. The Ecological Systems Theory developed by Bronfenbrenner provides a lens through which we can see how religious practices and beliefs function within the microsystem, affecting a child's sense of self and identity in the world (Martinez et al., 2020). A family's identity is frequently shaped by its religious beliefs, which influence the values and tenets that direct their daily activities (Gralewski & Jankowska, 2020). A child learns these beliefs by imitating behaviors, rituals, and practices in addition to formal religious instruction. These experiences can significantly impact a child's sense of self. For instance, children who grow up in a family with strong religious beliefs may develop a sense of direction and morality based on their faith (Martinez et al., 2020). They might absorb the idea that their actions have spiritual significance and that they are a part of a bigger, more meaningful story. This can result in a strong sense of self-identity and purpose based on a larger spiritual framework. On the other hand, if religious views are imposed inflexibly or dogmatically, a child might feel afraid, guilty, or ashamed if they do not live up to these expectations. A damaged sense of self-identity brought on by feelings of inadequacy or fear of divine vengeance may result from this. The child might experience conflicting or unworthy feelings due to their inability to balance their inner sense of self with the external religious framework (Gralewski & Jankowska, 2020). The way that religious practices and beliefs function within the microsystem—which includes the immediate family and home environment—is emphasized by Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory. The caliber of religious instruction and practice directly influences a child's experiences and interactions within this microsystem. A child's interactions may be marked by curiosity and a sense of being valued for their questions and thoughts, for example, in a family that values candid conversations about faith and promotes religious exploration. This can help the child develop a positive sense of who they are and give them the confidence to interact meaningfully with their faith (Martinez et al., 2020).

Moreover, the influence of religious practices and beliefs on self-identity is strengthened by the mesosystem, which is the result of interactions between various microsystems (Newman & Newman, 2020). Cognitive dissonance may arise, for instance, if a child's experiences at home are consistent with their religious beliefs but conflicts with their experiences in other contexts, like school or social settings. The child's developing self-concept may be challenged by this incongruence, which could cause confusion or a fractured sense of identity. In addition, a child's self-identity in relation to religious beliefs is shaped by the exosystem and macrosystem, according to Bronfenbrenner's theory (Newman & Newman, 2020). Broader institutional and social influences, including schools, religious groups, and cultural norms, are included in the exosystem (O'Toole et al., 2019). These outside influences have the power to support or contradict the family's ingrained religious convictions. For example, if a child's religious beliefs are supported and celebrated within their larger community, it can provide a sense of validation and belonging, further bolstering their self-identity. The macrosystem, which encompasses the broader cultural and societal context, also influences a child's perception of self in relation to their religious beliefs. Cultural norms and societal attitudes toward religion can impact how a child views their faith and its place in their identity (Newman & Newman, 2020). For example, in a society that values religious diversity and tolerance, children may feel more empowered to explore and express their faith in a way that aligns with their sense of self (O'Toole et al., 2019). Thus, the interplay of religious beliefs and parenting practices within Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory significantly shapes a child's self-identity, emphasizing the need for a balanced and open approach to fostering a healthy spiritual foundation.

Conclusion

Four key areas of child development that play a major role in a child's developing sense of self have been covered in the essay. These domains, which include Religious Beliefs and Parenting practices, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Attachment Theory, and Parenting Styles, each have a unique and crucial impact on a child's views. The complex interactions between environmental factors and a child's developing identity have been better understood by applying Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory as a lens of analysis. It is important to recognize that these are a small portion of the complex factors at work. It is critical to acknowledge and understand these dynamics to provide children with the support and direction they require as they negotiate the complex process of self-discovery and identity formation.

References

Alhowaymel, F., Kalmakis, K., & Jackson, C. (2021). Developing the concept of adverse childhood experiences: A global perspective. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 56, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.10.004

Balantekin, K. N., Anzman?Frasca, S., Francis, L. A., Ventura, A. K., Fisher, J. O., & Johnson, S. L. (2020). Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence. Pediatric Obesity, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12722

Chen, X., Allen, J. L., & Hesketh, T. (2023). The influence of individual, peer, and family factors on the educational aspirations of adolescents in rural China. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09765-3

Crawford, M. (2020). Ecological Systems theory: Exploring the development of the theoretical framework as conceived by Bronfenbrenner. J Pub Health Issue Pract, 4(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.33790/jphip1100170

Feriver, ?., Olgan, R., Teksöz, G., & Barth, M. (2020). Impact of Early Childhood Education settings on the systems thinking skills of preschool children through the lens of Bronfenbrenner’s theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2749

Gagliardi, M. (2021). How our caregivers shape who we are: The seven dimensions of attachment at the core of personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657628

Gagliardi, M. (2022). Human attachment as a multi-dimensional control system: A computational implementation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844012

Gao, D., Liu, J., Bullock, A., Li, D., & Chen, X. (2021). Transactional models linking maternal authoritative parenting, child self-esteem, and approach coping strategies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101262

Gilgoff, R., Singh, L., Koita, K., Gentile, B., & Marques, S. S. (2020). Adverse childhood experiences, outcomes, and interventions. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 67(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2019.12.001

Gralewski, J., & Jankowska, D. M. (2020). Do parenting styles matter? Perceived dimensions of parenting styles, creative abilities, and creative self-beliefs in adolescents. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100709

Halifah, S., & Anshar, N. (2020). The Role of Primary Caregivers in Building Self-Concept of Early Years’ Children. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200808.048

‌Harlow, E. (2019). Attachment theory: Developments, debates and recent applications in social work, social care and education. Journal of Social Work Practice, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1700493

Hayes, N., O'Toole, L., & Halpenny, A. M. (2022). Introducing Bronfenbrenner: A guide for practitioners and students in early years education. Taylor & Francis.

Leza, L., Siria, S., López-Goñi, J. J., & Fernández-Montalvo, J. (2021). Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and substance use disorder (SUD): A scoping review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 221(1), 108563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108563

Martinez, I., Garcia, F., Veiga, F., Garcia, O. F., Rodrigues, Y., & Serra, E. (2020). Parenting styles, internalization of values and self-esteem: A cross-cultural study in Spain, Portugal and Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2370. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072370

Narayan, A. J., Lieberman, A. F., & Masten, A. S. (2021). Intergenerational transmission and prevention of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Clinical Psychology Review, 85(85), 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101997

Navarro, J. L., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2022). Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. Current Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3

Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2020). Theories of adolescent development. Academic Press.

O'Toole, L., Hayes, N., & Halpenny, A. M. (2019). Animating Systems: The ecological value of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model of development. In Ecologies for Learning and practice (pp. 19-31). Routledge.

‌Paquette, D., & Ryan, J. (2011). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265485344_Bronfenbrenner

Sanvictores, T., & Mendez, M. D. (2023). Types of Parenting Styles and Effects On Children. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568743/#:~:text=Authoritarian%20Parenting

Shahid, N., & Akhter, D. S. (2023). Parenting style and social-emotional competence among adolescents. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(7), 201–209. https://mail.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/17220

Tudge, J. R. H., Merçon-Vargas, E. A., & Payir, A. (2022). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory: Its development, core concepts, and critical issues. Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methodologies, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92002-9_16

‌Ward, R. (2020). Learning Sensitivity. Emerald Publishing Limited EBooks, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-147-720201009

Wilson-Ali, N., Barratt-Pugh, C., & Knaus, M. (2019). Multiple perspectives on attachment theory: investigating educators’ knowledge and understanding. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119855214